The past few months have produced numerous debates on our constitutional rights. Part of the discussion revolves around the idea of privacy. This is somewhat puzzling as there are many instances in this country where identification and checks involving personal information is required. We accept these requirements as a means to obtaining our goal. We don’t cry that it violates our rights. We understand the necessity of proving our identity, and other information for a variety of everyday activity. Somehow this has been forgotten.
We need a photo I.D. to get on a plane, enter certain establishments, organizations and events, purchase alcohol, and do many financial transactions. We need to present it when we vote which is also a constitutional right. There has been some protest regarding these issues, but nothing that has caused a large national outcry.
When we apply for a credit card, loan, or mortgage, our entire credit history is researched and analyzed. Every dime we borrowed is scrutinized and evaluated in determining if we are eligible for the type of credit for which we are applying. We accept the consequences of our past actions, and understand that banks and lending institutions have the right to obtain this information.
If we purchase or sell a home, it becomes a matter of public record and often the transaction is printed in local newspapers. Personally I don’t like the idea that a person’s name and address, as well as the amount of money involved is made available, but the paper has the right to report it. In my newspaper they even print divorces. That seems over the top in terms of needing to know, but it is allowed.
When we get on a plane, we have to produce I.D. as stated above, and go through security. Our bags and self are scanned for anything suspicious. There have been cases of TSA officials going too far, but after 9/11, most people favor these measures as a means of providing steps to insure our safety. The masses aren’t screaming about their rights.
When I registered my kids for school, I had to bring along the deed to my home to prove my place of residency. Due to current events, I now have to produce I.D. to any school personnel who make a request. Everyone understands the necessity of these new procedures without question.
Many places of business, education, and health, require fingerprinting, drug tests, and background checks. If you want the job you will comply. Applications ask if you have ever committed a crime. I’m sure most individuals would not want to submit such information, but it is all part of the hiring process. Some jobs require testing in order to obtain a license rendering them competent in their field. Fail the test and you don’t get the license. If you don’t have a license, you can’t have the job.
However, there are places in this country where an individual can purchase a gun with nothing more than a simple permit. They don’t have to pass a test. They don’t need a license. The seller doesn’t need to conduct a background check. There are so many other instances in which we subject ourselves to checks, tests, licensing, and identification. Why does this issue suddenly violate our rights? If gun advocates want to prove that owners of guns are responsible and trained, they should be out in full support of universal background checks. It is a requirement that should be upheld and fulfilled. It is a responsibility that must come along with a right.
Support the Cause. Take the Sandy Hook promise. http://causes.com/sandyhookpromise